United Kingdom, Intermediaries

Euro-area equities: all eyes on company earnings

Euro-area equities remain attractively valued, with the possibility of a stronger-than-expected economic recovery

Views expressed are those of the author and are subject to change. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional or institutional investors only.

Key points

In my view:

  • Strong euro-area equity performance in 2019 probably reflects reduced tail risks, rather than optimism on company growth or earnings.
  • Potential upside risk from stronger earnings, healthier GDP growth or rising long-term interest rates could support euro-area assets versus the US.
  • Downside risk related to Brexit and potential trade conflicts with the US persists.
  • Euro-area equities remain attractively valued, with the possibility of a stronger-than-expected economic recovery.

Have downside risks diminished?

In 2019, euro-area equities very nearly kept pace with the US market, despite an industrial recession, weak economic growth overall in the eurozone, a sharp decline in earnings and rising long-term interest rates.

The market appears to have decided that downside risks have diminished:

  • A large-scale global trade conflict that could hurt the euro area now seems less likely.
  • A hard Brexit outcome has been avoided (for now).
  • Growth in the euro area may be low, but in my view, a sharp recession seems improbable, particularly if global growth picks up.
  • Low inflation does not seem likely to turn into deflation.

It looks like markets are pricing in an only modest recovery in growth and earnings, with none of these large downside risks materialising.

Figure 1

After a touch 2019, when will an earnings recovery kick in?

Balance of risks is to the upside

Nominal euro-area GDP growth and earnings might recover faster than currently anticipated. The market consensus is for tepid growth, but the trade and investment cycle might turn up more aggressively and faster than expected. Indeed, recent activity indicators are consistent with such a turn. The economic surprise indices suggest a sharp turn in January 2020.

Figure 2

Euro-area economic data have surprised to the upside

If growth and earnings surprise on the upside, equities should start closing some of the performance gap with the US. Euro-area risk assets should continue to recover and yields on long-dated government bonds should drift upwards (prices fall when yields rise). Given the strong price appreciation in 2019, euro-area equity valuations look less attractive on an absolute basis compared to a year ago, although macro valuation metrics are still favourable. In relative terms, euro-area equities remain attractive, particularly in France, Germany and Italy. Spain is somewhat less attractive due to the risk of a worsening political and regulatory environment.

Downside trade and political risks remain

On the downside, it is hard to be confident about the outlook for global trade, and Brexit may return as a risk later in the year.

The euro area suffered through an industrial and trade downturn over the last year, with the German economy particularly exposed to the weak auto sector and soft global investment demand. If global demand and trade recover, exports should pick up rapidly.

The trade conflict between the US and China also highlights the fragility of the global trade system. Having settled “phase one” with China, will the US try a similarly aggressive approach with the EU? The EU-US trade relationship is more balanced, much bigger and more complex, and an aggressive US stance could trigger a forceful EU response. Both sides have a lot to lose from such a conflict. The digital services tax and the Boeing/Airbus disputes are current flashpoints, but not enough, in my view, to trigger a trade war. A more likely trigger would be if the US were to impose broad-based tariffs on EU goods. This is a key risk to monitor over 2020 and possibly beyond.

So what’s in the price?

Market valuations probably reflect a relatively slow growth and earnings recovery. Last year’s strong equity returns do not reflect an optimistic earnings outlook or a strong recovery. Instead, they indicate a re-evaluation of risks, notably a perception that trade, recession, deflation and Brexit risks are much lower than was feared a year ago. I do not believe that the market is pricing a strong recovery. If a stronger or earlier-than-expected recovery appears, it could drive earnings and valuations higher.

Please see the important disclosure page for more information.

Recommended for you

Climate change and emerging markets: assessing opportunities and challenges
Emerging markets are on the front lines of climate change. Aware of the challenges, many EM companies are developing solutions, shifting business models and realigning corporate policies to help them prepare. Two of our EM portfolio managers share insights on the investing landscape and offer a framework for incorporating climate-related themes into a portfolio.
September 2020
Climate change and emerging markets: assessing opportunities and challenges
,
Technology: How COVID-19 has brought forward the future
The COVID-19 crisis has been a key catalyst for long-term value creation in the technology sector. Portfolio Manager Bruce Glazer highlights five big sector trends that aren't going away anytime soon.
July 2020
Technology: How COVID-19 has brought forward the future
,
Investment bytes – Asia tech <span>Part six: the world’s hub of innovation</span>
We profile Asia technology in the 2020s, outlining the long-term case for the sector after its strong rebound in recent months.
July 2020
Investment bytes – Asia tech Part six: the world’s hub of innovation
,
Asking private companies to show their ESG<br> credentials
ESG issues are a growing area of focus in the public market, but what about the private market? Our co-head of Private Investments and our director of ESG, Private Investments, argue for informed and active ownership from the initial investment until the IPO.
July 2020
Asking private companies to show their ESG
credentials
,
Euro-area equities: reasons to be optimistic
Macro Strategist Jens Larsen looks at fiscal policies and outlines why he is optimistic about the outlook for euro area equities over the next 12 months.
June 2020
Euro-area equities: reasons to be optimistic
,
A is for allocation: the rationale for increasing exposure<br> to China
Allocations to China equity are widely recommended, but how much is appropriate and why? We consider several reasons why this may make sense for offshore investors.
June 2020
A is for allocation: the rationale for increasing exposure
to China
,
Investment bytes – Asia tech<br><span>Part five: The hidden growth story in Japan tech</span>
Learn why the hidden growth story within Japanese tech is one of our highest conviction themes, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 crisis.
June 2020
Investment bytes – Asia tech
Part five: The hidden growth story in Japan tech
,
An index isn’t a fiduciary — and six other concerns about the push for passive
We offer a framework for investors grappling with the role of active and passive strategies, taking into account key decision points such as the “zero-sum” argument for passive, the role of market inefficiency, and the possibility of finding an above-average manager.
May 2020
An index isn’t a fiduciary — and six other concerns about the push for passive
,
We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To accept cookies click Accept & Close, or continue browsing as normal. For more information, visit Cookies & Tracking NoticE.